"He who marches out of step hears another drum." ~ Ken Kesey
Even with the tape and razor blade test? Huh. To be honest, I don't use UV, but I have been researching it for a while. One of the issues is that the lower layers cannot be fully cured, not unlike flashing an underbase before you go on to the next layer. From what I have read, it is totally possible that the top layer is scratching off due to the layer under it being over cured.I would test out how little curing on the lower layers I could do without running into blocking issues and see if the problem persists.This dude is probably a better source, http://bhargavmistry.wordpress.com/2010/02/17/how-to-maintain-consistency-with-curing-uv-inks/ From what he writes, post cure doesn't sound like something you want to do.This white paper also supports that idea, http://www.pneac.org/sheets/screen/UVCurableInk.pdfIn a way, I kind of like solvent over UV in this case because the top layer of ink will partially dissolve the lower layer with its solvent. There has to be a way to test this like you can with a exposure test for emulsion.
Get a UV cure-test puck, it becomes you're bible when doing multi color and even for checking proper cure on single color. Belt setting are a handy starting point, but UV bulb degrade in power over time and your cure rate will be changing along with them. The best point is not over curing the first few colors so subsequent layers adhere properly.
Somethings goofy then. Is the ink fresh? Does left over ink go back in the cans after being on screen? Has the UV puck been calibrated recently?We found you don't get quite the durability from UV that you get with solvent inks, but it should still be relatively tough and should stand up to standard adhesion tests.Some more info might be helpful, what substrate are you printing on?