Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
Hi everyoneI would 1st like to thank Pierre for taking the time out of his busy schedule to test the BJ2K, and confirm the unit’s performance for the people of this forum.Pierre had so many tools for checking the quality of screen printing, that at one point I felt like he might be the Batman of screen printing. “Where does he get all those wonderful toys?”I now understand why he is so highly regarded! The quality control of his product says it all! You’re a great screen printer, but a better person. Thanks again Pierre, it was an honor to meet you.Louwww.LDTronix.com
Quote from: blue moon on February 22, 2013, 04:54:26 PMQuote from: balloonguy on February 22, 2013, 04:17:29 PM5 seconds seems too short to me. It leaves very little room for adjusting exposure time. I know sometimes if I am running low on screens and I am putting something on a 280 that should be on a 305 I may under expose slightly to make washout of the finer detail easier and then hit with a post expose. Can you set the time on this to 4.72 seconds if you want to do this?Agreed! The latitude at such small numbers needs to be infractions of a second! this was one of the things Lou and I discussed and will be implemented in the future. I have a feeling it is not a big deal and can be available right now, but he will have to confirm.pierreI was thinking with exposure times so short, and the typically small window of ideal time for some of the "fast" emulsions on the market, might an integrator of sorts that could be programmed to reduce the light output to allow for more fine tuning on an as-needed basis? I know it seems counterproductive, but with times like 5 seconds, going up to ten, or striking an ideal time somewhere in between might actually be more desirable. Can emulsion physically react positively to times in tenths and hundredths of a second if a timer capable of accurately cutting the light to those degrees were incorporated?
Quote from: balloonguy on February 22, 2013, 04:17:29 PM5 seconds seems too short to me. It leaves very little room for adjusting exposure time. I know sometimes if I am running low on screens and I am putting something on a 280 that should be on a 305 I may under expose slightly to make washout of the finer detail easier and then hit with a post expose. Can you set the time on this to 4.72 seconds if you want to do this?Agreed! The latitude at such small numbers needs to be infractions of a second! this was one of the things Lou and I discussed and will be implemented in the future. I have a feeling it is not a big deal and can be available right now, but he will have to confirm.pierre
5 seconds seems too short to me. It leaves very little room for adjusting exposure time. I know sometimes if I am running low on screens and I am putting something on a 280 that should be on a 305 I may under expose slightly to make washout of the finer detail easier and then hit with a post expose. Can you set the time on this to 4.72 seconds if you want to do this?
anything is possible.Also, here is a concern...how are the bulb strips assembled, can a single bulb be replaced? Or do you have to replace the entire strip? What does a replacement strip run?I know, bulbs are rated for 50,000 to 100,000 hours, but have you ever seen an LED traffic signal with every bulb working?
is it possible to remove the glass and expose CTS imaged screens on this?
Ok, how about uv ink curing units? Nazdar has developed an ink system or systems that are tailor made for LED curing, but are sort of hush hush about it. When I talked to the Nazdar rep about it, he said something about only selling to companies that have the R&D to make the curing unit. So far as I have been able to find, no one has come out with a commercial solution yet and it seems like it would be no more difficult to do than what you did with this BJ machine. Well, I guess a radiometer might be necessary.