As mentioned, only pure photo-polymer emulsion continues to cross link in the sun. The issue with many exposure systems out today is complete cross linking is not possible. Metal halide lights cross link better but there is a huge difference in a 1k vs an 8k in terms of exposure quality strength. Getting maximum resolution and full exposure are two competing outcomes. Unfortunately under exposure to get fine halftones has become the norm which creates havoc with water base and discharge inks. Plastisol inks are far less aggressive. So what I see in my demos are screen rooms using this "plastisol under exposure technique" for LED lights and the result is water base, discharge and HSA ink screens breakdown quickly. Durability is directly related to how long you expose on the first shot and the quality and amplitude of the light used. Post exposure as mentioned is a band aid.
Maximum initial exposure quality is time, wattage and wave length related (since diazo and pure photopolymers like different wavelengths.) With thin coating techniques and pushing LED exposure up as far as possible LED can yield a screen capable of water base or discharge, but take an 8k metal halide multi spectral lamp and maximize exposure time and the screen can be bullet proof with a greater degree of cross linking. However in today's churn and burn screen rooms CTS/LED systems have significant ROI that can't be ignored.
This is one reason why we developed a pure photopolymer for LED that is water resistant and can print plastisol as well. T9 can be post exposed for added strength, while our SP1400 would just be dried well in the sun but still has good durability with LED systems and complete exposure. Always post expose the squeegee side of the screen, this side is not completely cross linked with LED exposure and will be affected by water base ink systems. For S Mesh Screens avoid baking screens for long periods since the frames can expand and go past max tension for the mesh.