Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
Printavo had the most promise but we can't have separate price structures on one invoice. So billing for vehicle graphics and t's on the same invoice is a no go, we can do it on separate invoices but that's just not going to work. So nuts to that program.
bitter? yeah I could see that....I've spent months going over everything I could get my hands on...trials for days....I hate them all Printavo had the most promise but we can't have separate price structures on one invoice. So billing for vehicle graphics and t's on the same invoice is a no go, we can do it on separate invoices but that's just not going to work. So nuts to that program.EstiMate was made with windows 95. Graphix Calc - work flow was all whackyT-quoter is old...too many issues to deal withPrice-it doesn't offer anything for the sign department.Teecal was cumbersome and too many steps to get to the price.Fast manager - nopethere were a few others I tried, can't think of them at the moment......and then there was ShopVox.....ready to smack your computer with your keyboard? Do you like taking the space shuttle to get your mail? download the trial today!I can not possibly be the only guy offering screen printing, embroidery signage, vehicle graphics and promo stuff. That's like our entire industry....Printavo may have it in the next few years but until then....I'll keep banging my face on the screen
Whoa, this guy went full out on his review and page, truly not playing games with this I see. I still use Fast Manager, it's buggy and not perfect but it does work for me. I was sure Printavo would be better for me but it wasn't. I haven't tried any of the others yet as each time I look into one there is a glaring reason not to.
We settled on Printavo a couple months ago. The only thing that really irritates me is the quickbooks sync to Quickbooks Online only. We used to have Quickbook Enterprise...which was much more robust than the puny Online version. It constantly has syncing errors.They need to add a bigger picture of the art proof to the Work Order.Other than that it's really nice for the production side.
All of these software systems are being built by developers that have a little bit of a background in printing. Stokkup looks really promising, but it's very very strict. you have to work exactly like the shop that built it, in order for it to function. I'm working really hard with them, to break that.Printavo has a bunch of updates coming out, but i feel they aren't really production driven.
Quote from: ericheartsu on March 14, 2018, 05:44:16 PMAll of these software systems are being built by developers that have a little bit of a background in printing. Stokkup looks really promising, but it's very very strict. you have to work exactly like the shop that built it, in order for it to function. I'm working really hard with them, to break that.Printavo has a bunch of updates coming out, but i feel they aren't really production driven.I disagree, I watched a few videos on Stokkup and ended up just shaking my head.Flexibility is key. If there is one constant theme of this forum it's that everybody does things a different way and still ends up getting the job done. Also, what a lot of these programs overlook is one simple factor. Information is hands down the most important part of this industry. If a customer orders polos 3 years ago and needs to reorder them, the order should be saved with every piece of info needed to re-run that job and have it turn out the exact same.When I go into a fast food restaurant I expect the food to be the same whether I am at the store down the street or the store across the country. Our customers expect the same, they want the same exact order they placed years ago to be exactly the same.Most programs overlook this. I think it's a central piece to the whole system.I am working on assembling my team to see what we can do. We'll see if it goes anywhere...it may just end up like The Vindicators from Rick and Morty