Author Topic: Wanted- a non tacky photopolymer emulsion  (Read 7820 times)

Offline Atownsend

  • !!!
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 421
Re: Wanted- a non tacky photopolymer emulsion
« Reply #15 on: June 05, 2017, 08:11:24 PM »
Thanks for the info!! Will be implementing the powder trick until we have time to play with some of the suggested emulsions here. Tackiness has been a big problem for us. Trashed 10 of 20 positives today.


Offline Nation03

  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1259
  • The Dude abides.
Re: Wanted- a non tacky photopolymer emulsion
« Reply #16 on: June 06, 2017, 07:02:56 AM »
Baby powder helped save films for repeat orders. Ulano Orange had minimal tack and my local sales rep wants me to try Ulano Blue. Saati PV has been the tackiest so far. Cryocoat wasn't too bad but I think Ulano Orange was the least tacky that I've tried this year so far.

Offline alan802

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3535
  • I like to screen print
Re: Wanted- a non tacky photopolymer emulsion
« Reply #17 on: June 06, 2017, 09:14:50 AM »
Thanks for the info!! Will be implementing the powder trick until we have time to play with some of the suggested emulsions here. Tackiness has been a big problem for us. Trashed 10 of 20 positives today.

You may find the powder trick to be sufficient if you like your current emulsion a lot.  It's one of the few "bandaids" I don't mind doing around here.  I did spend hours upon hours trying to figure out how to get regular emulsions from eating our positives and now I would rather find a good emulsion that we like, that has minimal tack and use the powder. 
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it -T.J.
Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigues of supporting it -T.P.

Offline 3Deep

  • !!!
  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 5324
Re: Wanted- a non tacky photopolymer emulsion
« Reply #18 on: June 06, 2017, 09:35:35 AM »
CCI HXT you'll love it
Life is like Kool-Aid, gotta add sugar/hardwork to make it sweet!!

Offline Frog

  • Administrator
  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13980
  • Docendo discimus
Re: Wanted- a non tacky photopolymer emulsion
« Reply #19 on: June 06, 2017, 10:24:38 AM »
Thanks for the info!! Will be implementing the powder trick until we have time to play with some of the suggested emulsions here. Tackiness has been a big problem for us. Trashed 10 of 20 positives today.

You may find the powder trick to be sufficient if you like your current emulsion a lot.  It's one of the few "bandaids" I don't mind doing around here.  I did spend hours upon hours trying to figure out how to get regular emulsions from eating our positives and now I would rather find a good emulsion that we like, that has minimal tack and use the powder.

I sometimes cringe when the term "bandaid" is used as a temporary or even half-assed fix because, in the real world, actual bandaids are often exactly the fix one wants. Not every cut requires sutures.
That rug really tied the room together, did it not?

Offline CBCB

  • !!!
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 490
Re: Wanted- a non tacky photopolymer emulsion
« Reply #20 on: June 07, 2017, 06:17:56 AM »
We tried Chromatech WR and it was insanely sticky. Film was fused to the emulsion.

We're on Ulano Orange in the meantime.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Offline Nation03

  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1259
  • The Dude abides.
Re: Wanted- a non tacky photopolymer emulsion
« Reply #21 on: July 06, 2017, 06:44:10 AM »
Not sure if this one was mentioned yet, but I'm currently using Ulano Blue and there is zero tack on even the most humid days. I haven't been using baby powder with it and the films come off perfectly.

Offline domineight

  • Verified/Junior
  • **
  • Posts: 90
Re: Wanted- a non tacky photopolymer emulsion
« Reply #22 on: July 06, 2017, 07:33:26 AM »
Why don't you just turn the heat up in the drying room.  The emulsion can only be tacky if it's full of moisture.


Online tonypep

  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 5683
Re: Wanted- a non tacky photopolymer emulsion
« Reply #23 on: July 06, 2017, 08:00:19 AM »
Not necessarily true

Offline domineight

  • Verified/Junior
  • **
  • Posts: 90
Re: Wanted- a non tacky photopolymer emulsion
« Reply #24 on: July 06, 2017, 08:24:07 AM »
Not entirely,  but highly probable.

Click the fan heater on high in the morning, direct the flow of warm air across the rack of screens intended to expose, but don't touch them till 10am. I'd  hazard a guess there would be a noticeable improvement.

I'll take a stab and say the tackiness in most part is inkjet film sticking to the stencil. Why?

Online Admiral

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 890
Re: Wanted- a non tacky photopolymer emulsion
« Reply #25 on: July 06, 2017, 12:11:55 PM »
The heat from exposing and using the glass (keeping a lot of the heat in) I'm sure adds to the problem.  Cooling down the exposure unit better / not using it as fast between screens (see if you can add coating at the same time as making screens?) would help.

I'm glad to be rid of that problem with CTS.  I do remember some films sticking really bad when the temp and humidity was really high in the summer.

Offline domineight

  • Verified/Junior
  • **
  • Posts: 90
Re: Wanted- a non tacky photopolymer emulsion
« Reply #26 on: July 06, 2017, 05:55:00 PM »
I have the same. Film sticks when humidity climbs up to 50%+  and first thing in the morning. I have a 10'X10' room with a domestic dehumidifier that runs 24h and the little fan heater gets clicked on high first thing in the morning.

If I can maintain a ratio of 30% humidity and 35 degrees in heat, film sticking isn't an issue. Outside of that I'm blasting black inkjet film off my stencil or peeling the frame off the glass regardless of emulsion.

I just make sure I'm setup for the following morning the previous afternoon to overcome the gap in waiting for the heat to climb.

I've been using a Roland ecosol printer for film for the last month through necessity , I don't have that sticking problem while I'm using this.

Generally I'll use Ulano QTX or QX1, Foteco 1850 solo.
M&R trilight 3kW.

I might run things hotter in the drying room because I'm generally impatient anyway, but ruining film I might need to expose again drives me nuts, as does washing the black ink out of my exposed stencil. And heat is how I overcome it, it's not excessive heat either IMO.

It would be interesting to hear how someone with something like a vastex drying cabinet or that type of generic screen cabinet gets on and whether they suffer from this specific problem.

Offline Colin

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1610
  • Ink and Chemical Product Manager
Re: Wanted- a non tacky photopolymer emulsion
« Reply #27 on: July 06, 2017, 07:29:10 PM »
The sticking is generally a chemistry issue.

While yes, humidity will always play a roll.  If you have eliminated the moisture issues, what remains is the plastisizers in the emulsion.  Under heat, these plasticizers are tacky and grab at all films.  Waterbase films exacerbate the issue compared to silver or laser films.

Tldr:  If your screens have an average of 35% internal humidity and they are still sticking during exposure, either change your emulsion or use baby powder/talcum powder.
Been in the industry since 1996.  5+ years with QCM Inks.  Been a part of shops of all sizes and abilities both as a printer and as an Artist/separator.  I am now the Ink and Chemical Product Manager at Ryonet.

Offline Rockers

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2073
Re: Wanted- a non tacky photopolymer emulsion
« Reply #28 on: July 06, 2017, 08:03:23 PM »
Why don't you just turn the heat up in the drying room.  The emulsion can only be tacky if it's full of moisture.
I don`t think so.

Offline domineight

  • Verified/Junior
  • **
  • Posts: 90
Re: Wanted- a non tacky photopolymer emulsion
« Reply #29 on: July 06, 2017, 09:34:18 PM »
Why not?

You didn't elaborate on the effect of tacky stencils, or what it's doing that's causing you to look for a cure. If it's just a case of everything working as it should then that's probably not a problem.
Reading what others have said they have film sticking to emulsion, destroying their positives. Perhaps wrongly I'm assuming inkjet positives.

Do they have the same problem using image setter film or solvent film? If these two films are sticking, but peeling away unharmed and the stencil is still washing out fine, that's not a problem is it?

I guess to answer the question without elaborating. Ulano QTX, is fine, no sticking problems what so ever. No need for talcum powder, the emulsion never sticks to glass, your inkjet positives are perfectly fine and peel away unharmed, with only the slightest hesitation after having been compressed with vacuum for as long as it takes to expose whatever I'm exposing. Actually I don't have a problem with emulsions being tacky at all, at least not all the emulsions I've tried.

If I was to elaborate on that, I only ever achieved a non tacky emulsion (regardless of make up), that would cause problems in keeping inkjet film in good reusable condition, when I eliminated moisture from my stencils as best I could. In saying that, I might just be lucky.

I'm not going to delve too deeply into it, I don't know the science. I just know inkjet film isn't sticky, but when I lick my thumb and grab an edge of inkjet film it's sticks to my thumb like a bastard, and that tells me moisture effects inkjet film and if any moisture comes in contact with the inkjet film and is compressed under pressure for a few minutes, then the film is going to stick to whatever it's in contact with like a self adhesive label. Likewise, glass doesn't have any adhesive properties so any problem associated with emulsion sticking to glass would have to rightly boil down to emulsion, so why not look at moisture content of the stencil as a reasonable cause of tackiness there too.

That, or it seems folk swear by talcum powder with no ill effect and minimal fuss, I'll give it a go myself sometime.