"He who marches out of step hears another drum." ~ Ken Kesey
Unfortunately not. I'm pretty anal about making sure there is no real air flow. Honestly, the only thing that has really changed is the Wilflex ink. I'm going to grab a quart of something else and see if the results vary. That would be fairly heart breaking because I LOVE the opacity/mat down/feel of the quick white.
Sooooooo....... Extensive testing really may have me even more confused then when I started. It's WILD how a temp gun can be reading a surface jumping upwards of 400 while temp strips on top of the garment are just getting 290.
Quote from: Frog on January 13, 2017, 08:20:32 PMQuote from: ZooCity on January 13, 2017, 06:40:51 PMVoted donut but the strips, if they are accurate, are smart as you can "map" your cure on a specific garment if need be.You may remember that back on the old board, I often recommended putting strips on the inside, to really know that the bottom of the ink deposit has reached temp.btw, I cut them down the middle lengthways, and double my stash.Putting it on the iniside is brilliant! If not and you use an electric dryer and a temp strip you will effectivelyMeasure the emissivity value of the temp strip!
Quote from: ZooCity on January 13, 2017, 06:40:51 PMVoted donut but the strips, if they are accurate, are smart as you can "map" your cure on a specific garment if need be.You may remember that back on the old board, I often recommended putting strips on the inside, to really know that the bottom of the ink deposit has reached temp.btw, I cut them down the middle lengthways, and double my stash.
Voted donut but the strips, if they are accurate, are smart as you can "map" your cure on a specific garment if need be.
Sooooooo....... Extensive testing really may have me even more confused then when I started. It's WILD how a temp gun can be reading a surface jumping upwards of 400 while temp strips on top of the garment are just getting 290. I experimented with so many variations. I really thought that turning the temp way down and running the belt so slowly that the shirt was in the 2 foot tunnel for over a minute would be the key, but at the end of the day I still don't have an actual sense of how hot this ink layer is actually getting. Would a donut probe even work properly in a tunnel this small?I feel like my takeaway from all this is to A.) Count my blessings that I've never had a complaint. B.) Continue business as usual, but really start putting away some money to get a bigger dryer that will help me sleep at night a little better.On that note, Does anyone have some recommendations? I don't have a TON of room, so I'm still looking to be on the smaller side within reason. I know that BBC does make a version of this dryer with a 4 foot tunnel and Vastex has some newer dyers that are on the small side, but modular so you can add heat elements as you grow. Any thoughts?
....Since the heat controller cycles on & off to maintain temp, and the panel is so short, I believe it's possible to get one shirt on the "low" end of the cycle and another on the high, which could cause inconsistencies from shirt to shirt. (I think this is what lrsbranding was getting at earlier.)...
A buddy of mine let me borrow his heat press, and sure enough, that solved the problem. Clearly not an optimal situation, but it will give me some peace of mind until I move onto bigger and better things.