Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
Thanks Danny! I did get it and it will ship today. I will send you tracking shortly.Thanks again.Kevin
Quote from: KevWilso on January 14, 2016, 03:23:55 PMThanks Danny! I did get it and it will ship today. I will send you tracking shortly.Thanks again.KevinJust got tracking, holy cow that was fast! Kevin you rock dude! That service was flawless Two thumbs up for River City
Quote from: mimosatexas on January 14, 2016, 01:25:54 PM<snip> I also see foil prints in stores and being worn on occasion that look MUCH smoother than I have ever been able to get. Usually my foils seem to pickup a bit of the texture of the shirt, while I have seen foil that looks pretty much perfectly smooth, almost like vinyl, but with the softer, thinner results you see with foil. Any ideas on how to get the smoother finish?PFP'ing Wilflex HD Gel II through a 110 (110-80) mesh gets us the smoothest foiled effects. YMMV. I've done some 135-48 and can't really tell much difference. Crown Gold foils perfect for us using it, but it doesn't have as nice a feel as the waterbased Virus adhesive. With silver, I ALWAYS use the Virus, regardless of the desired hand.And on a personal note, my new vacuum platen (Mimosatexas Style ) works great! I want to try to print some HD Gel on transfer paper for foil. Just to see how it works. I might try 83 mesh and powder adhesive, cold peeled, and want to see if PFP'ing is still necessary. THANKS!!@ Ericheartsu, I didn't realize Kevin @ River City sold the Virus adhesive. I can highly recommend using the retarder too. The adhesive "rolls up" in front of the floods and squeegees like butter. I use it on my manual too. Good stuff! Anyway problematic foils get the Virus treatment for us. Otherwise, Wilflex Clear HD Gel II. I suspect that the precise dialing in of temps, times, and pressures at the heat press have nearly as much bearing on success as what happens on the print floor. An air operated heat press sure helps with repeat-ability, since it eliminates one more squishy variable.
<snip> I also see foil prints in stores and being worn on occasion that look MUCH smoother than I have ever been able to get. Usually my foils seem to pickup a bit of the texture of the shirt, while I have seen foil that looks pretty much perfectly smooth, almost like vinyl, but with the softer, thinner results you see with foil. Any ideas on how to get the smoother finish?
What brand of foil is everyone using?We use Amagic/Klaser, but i'm wondering if there is something better?
Awesome, are you guys doing inline foil or using heat presses?Did you see our video how we do inline foil on the roq? Sounds like with that type of foil volume you NEED an inline solution!
Quote from: DannyGruninger on February 15, 2016, 04:27:22 PMAwesome, are you guys doing inline foil or using heat presses?Did you see our video how we do inline foil on the roq? Sounds like with that type of foil volume you NEED an inline solution!If that video is any sign of how slow that press goes there is no way I can use that method. We are running about 4500 units a day on a waterbase foil job. Sent from my LG-H901 using Tapatalk
Danny:If I understand correctly, Ttwo can't tie up his presses producing at your rate. I am assuming he is running much faster and its cheaper for him to foil afterwards while his presses are freed up to keep spinning.Although I would look at cost of employees doing foil vs money coming in on the presses spinning.... Must be really slim.