"He who marches out of step hears another drum." ~ Ken Kesey
Interesting Rockers, thanks!Pierre, in that link that Rockers posted, it mentions the net result... it would be a negative space of 50% (assuming I'm printing in a vacuum ). So I'd have to change to some other percentage to achieve what I wanted.Do any RIPS do this automagically?
When blending blue and yellow to make green they should print on top of each other and mix (just like you would make a green color by mixing blue and yellow). In 4CP, the dots are printed in a rosette and rather (also a fixed pattern) and rather than physically mixing the inks, it is their proximity that gives the illusion of the green.pierre
Jeff, I think that you at least owe Dan a thank you for the fuel for you to heat up this discussion! I understand that you're looking at some cold temps up there!
Quote from: blue moon on November 25, 2014, 08:53:47 PMWhen blending blue and yellow to make green they should print on top of each other and mix (just like you would make a green color by mixing blue and yellow). In 4CP, the dots are printed in a rosette and rather (also a fixed pattern) and rather than physically mixing the inks, it is their proximity that gives the illusion of the green.pierreThe most accurate way for 4-color process is actually to overprint all CMY dots the same angle except invert-lock the black with the other colors. The most accurate way for plastisol/opaque inks to blend is Interlocking all dots, index/stochastic FM or halftone AM.It is called the scientific method, it is a wonderful thing for having a question about the physical world and then running experiments and tests and comparisons to draw conclusions that are accurate and reliable. People can share their opinions based upon their apparent lack of understanding of these subjects, but it doesn't help the actual scientific progress going on, and it gets taken as fact by otherwise uninformed readers, which can actually harm the progress of the industry.