Author Topic: Simulated Process Printing Question  (Read 1715 times)

Offline ScreenPrinter123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 863
Simulated Process Printing Question
« on: April 09, 2014, 11:17:45 AM »
So for a 6-7 color simulated process print (for those of you who are pros at it) on a WHITE SHIRT, would you use 225's (S Mesh), 280's (T-Mesh) or 330's (S Mesh)?  What about on DARK SHIRTS -- 280's or 330's?  My main concern on the whites is fibrilation and the colors being vibrant.  My main concern on the dark colors is the ink colors being vibrant.  I am considering the 330's just for the purposes of higher lpi, as we should theoretically be able to retain similar detail (i.e., retain the same amount of halftones at a lower lpi) but am questioning if the vibrancy will be there -- and the other bonus is I'm imagining there's also some ink savings over 5,000 shirts? 

Thanks Pros.


Offline blue moon

  • Administrator
  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6366
Re: Simulated Process Printing Question
« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2014, 11:38:29 AM »
it will depend on the art. 330S (which should deposit more ink than the 280T) will not give enough opacity on the shirt if hit on it's own (i.e. any text printed with a 330 might be too thin).

if the art is depositing multiple layers of ink in different colors, 305/330 will work. If any of it is just a single layer, you might have to add another screen to print that particular part or boost it up.

Your total ink layer when printing with 305 should be in the 150-180% for good coverage and to avoid ink mushrooming out.

pierre
Yes, we've won our share of awards, and yes, I've tested stuff and read the scientific papers, but ultimately take everything I say with more than just a grain of salt! So if you are looking for trouble, just do as I say or even better, do something I said years ago!

Offline alan802

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3535
  • I like to screen print
Re: Simulated Process Printing Question
« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2014, 12:23:40 PM »
I've got the 280/34 depositing more ink than a 330/30 (about 12-15% without a calculator handy) with fairly similar size mesh opening.  I don't know that the difference between those ink deposits would change the overall look of the print a lot (it will but might not be noticeable to most) but the 330 should hold more detail if that's a concern. 
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it -T.J.
Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigues of supporting it -T.P.

Offline screenprintguy

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1677
  • Constantly thanking the Lord!
Re: Simulated Process Printing Question
« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2014, 12:27:41 PM »
man, we are still doing 230's for our sim pro, maybe I need to try using some of these higher mesh counts.  :o then agian I don't have the fancy machines ya'll have yet, YET I SAY YET  8)
Evolutionary Screen Printing & Embroidery
3521 Waterfield Parkway Lakeland, Fl. 33803 www.evolutionaryscreenprinting.com

Offline blue moon

  • Administrator
  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6366
Re: Simulated Process Printing Question
« Reply #4 on: April 09, 2014, 01:05:47 PM »
I've got the 280/34 depositing more ink than a 330/30 (about 12-15% without a calculator handy) with fairly similar size mesh opening.  I don't know that the difference between those ink deposits would change the overall look of the print a lot (it will but might not be noticeable to most) but the 330 should hold more detail if that's a concern.

you are right!!! had to look it up on the Murakami website and 330 deposits 17 units compared to 280's 20 units!

pierre
Yes, we've won our share of awards, and yes, I've tested stuff and read the scientific papers, but ultimately take everything I say with more than just a grain of salt! So if you are looking for trouble, just do as I say or even better, do something I said years ago!

Offline ScreenPrinter123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 863
Re: Simulated Process Printing Question
« Reply #5 on: April 09, 2014, 01:40:04 PM »
man, we are still doing 230's for our sim pro, maybe I need to try using some of these higher mesh counts.  :o then agian I don't have the fancy machines ya'll have yet, YET I SAY YET  8)

Look out.... you may just get censored if you were including me in that :-).


Offline screenprintguy

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1677
  • Constantly thanking the Lord!
Re: Simulated Process Printing Question
« Reply #6 on: April 09, 2014, 01:54:03 PM »
hahahahahaha
Evolutionary Screen Printing & Embroidery
3521 Waterfield Parkway Lakeland, Fl. 33803 www.evolutionaryscreenprinting.com

Offline JBLUE

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2036
Re: Simulated Process Printing Question
« Reply #7 on: April 09, 2014, 05:22:17 PM »
Depending on your ink and solid image areas you can get away with 230's. 225 S might lay down too much but again it depends on the solid areas. 225 S makes a great base screen if there is a lot of detail so you should try that one out.

Most people print with too much squeegee pressure so they run into problems running lower mesh. They think that if they go super high it is going to fix it. When they do, they run into even more problems trying to smash ink through a 305 or 330. They then make more mistakes by thinning the ink out, smashing the print, and really losing their opacity big time.

If your SOP is to lay down as much ink as you can when you print you have to change the way you think when printing good sim process work. The more you lay down the more problems it can cause during the run. This is where screen are really important. Good tight screens eliminate a lot of issues. Not saying some sloppy statics wont work but good tight screens make a big difference in the way they run.

www.inkwerksspd.com

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid...... Ben Franklin

Offline screenprintguy

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1677
  • Constantly thanking the Lord!
Re: Simulated Process Printing Question
« Reply #8 on: April 09, 2014, 05:40:58 PM »
For the last few years we've done our sim pro with 230's, standard mesh, haven't done the S thread with those yet. Tension around 40. Always comes out good, could always improve you know. I have a stack of frames that's growing that need to go back on the newman table, I'll order some higher mesh counts from Surlock give it a try. I know the S thread though you have to keep that tension lower, but I guess with that stuff, tight is tight and doesn't seem to give much.When you guys run your sim pro, what's your squeegee situation, we've always used triple duros, 70/90/70.
Evolutionary Screen Printing & Embroidery
3521 Waterfield Parkway Lakeland, Fl. 33803 www.evolutionaryscreenprinting.com

Offline ScreenPrinter123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 863
Re: Simulated Process Printing Question
« Reply #9 on: April 09, 2014, 08:29:22 PM »
75/95/75 here and sometimes 65/95/65 for the UB

Offline alan802

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3535
  • I like to screen print
Re: Simulated Process Printing Question
« Reply #10 on: April 10, 2014, 09:04:22 AM »
Smiling Jacks for everything over 225.  We've got the manny's and Dr J's for other applications but they don't typically do well with higher mesh counts.
I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it -T.J.
Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom, must, like men, undergo the fatigues of supporting it -T.P.

Offline CastleKing

  • Verified/Junior
  • **
  • Posts: 51
Re: Simulated Process Printing Question
« Reply #11 on: April 10, 2014, 12:46:14 PM »
We use 230 or 280's for UL and 280 or 355's for top colors. Squeegee is 60/90/60 on UL and 70/90/70 or Smilin' Jacks on top colors.
Dan Zmuda
Nazdar SourceOne
Product Manager