"He who marches out of step hears another drum." ~ Ken Kesey
Hi Bimm.The un matched or complimentary lpi screen angle is connected to moire. You get moire when having to screen angles collide that work against each other. The mesh (interference) is a different beast often thought of as moire, but is related to the (rule of thumb) connection. This is math. the math determibes the proper (mesh that works well) and has to do wether the mesh threads will be blocking the small dots. That is not morie, but (mesh interference. The two are different beast to tackle. When the mesh nears (too low) those thick mesh threads block small dots causing (interference) and can show that saw toothed jagged halftone at the end of a fade. Its very easy to mix works and have these terms confused with others. I still do myself sometimes. There is still yet another term that is similar but I forget what it is at the moment.
I guess I always thought that moire was "a pattern within a pattern". If there are dots not printing because of mesh interference, in a pattern, I thought that was moire. My mistake. My ulterior motive in my reply was sometimes you need to test and research.
So basically you're saying Murakami needs to come out with a 260-40 that you can tighten to 30 newtons and it's the mesh to end all meshes? :-). It seems to be too much of a jump anyway between the 225 and 310. Maybe I'm missing a mesh count offering???
Yep. That's what I was looking at - nothing with s mesh in between 225 And 310. Was hoping the 270t may have been a good mesh because it has comparable open area to the 225.
and here's a 230 for comparisonpierre