"He who marches out of step hears another drum." ~ Ken Kesey
Is this a super opaque, where you can P-F-P without an underbase such as Union Maxopake? How do the wet on wet capabilities compare to the MX system?
Quote from: Shanarchy on November 08, 2016, 02:24:27 PMIs this a super opaque, where you can P-F-P without an underbase such as Union Maxopake? How do the wet on wet capabilities compare to the MX system?Hi ThereIt is not super opaque - you will need an under base. The more opaque you make a system the bigger the compromise becomes regarding Pantone accuracy. It prints very similar to MX.Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
Has anyone used the Rio system on longer Sim. Process runs (500+)? If so how was the WOW print-ability and opacity throughout the run?
Any comments from Rio users... Happy or Not So Much?
Currently using mx and have the tester kit of the rio. What are the pros and cons of each comparatively? I have my main customer that is wanting brighter colors on darks...can I achieve this better with the rio?
Quote from: IntegriTees on November 29, 2016, 03:00:19 PMCurrently using mx and have the tester kit of the rio. What are the pros and cons of each comparatively? I have my main customer that is wanting brighter colors on darks...can I achieve this better with the rio?Sorry for the delay - printed side by side it is not too easy to spot visible differences in colour tints - this is a good thing as it shows both systems are accurate to Pantone - however, I have seen drawn down cards printed with both systems side by side and the Rio definitely has more opacity built into it.My suggestion would be try out the most problematic colours from MX with the RIO starter kit. Regardless, you will still need an under base.Regards PhilSent from my iPad using Tapatalk