"He who marches out of step hears another drum." ~ Ken Kesey
Well, looks like may be replacing my compressor... OK, soooo...Diamondback is rated to consume 19cfm @ 100psi.Current compressor is 7.5hp, 80gal tank,rated to deliver 23.1cfm @ the full 175 PSI http://www.grainger.com/Grainger/SPEEDAIRE-Electric-Air-Compressor-4XA60Looking at this one locally, also 7.5hp, 80gal tank, but rated at 24.3cfm @ 90psi, but max pressure at 175. http://www.tractorsupply.com/en/store/ingersoll-randreg%3B-75-hp-80-gallon-two-stage-air-compressorNow, does the CFM delivery offset the psi here? the max pressure on the Ingersoll unit is also 175, so I think it keeps the pressure at a range well above what the press consumes. Is there any reason this wouldn't work? Pros, cons?FYI, not worried about future expansion in this case...next press in the business plan will be servo-based and consume less air anyway.Thanks!!
...According to M&R website, My DB 6/8 requires 19cfm, but a Sportsman 10/12 (in the two year plan hopefully), only requires 9cfm. I assume the indexer and all print heads being servo (i.e., consuming no air them selves)makes this possible. I suppose then the only air being used is for the choppers and the table-lift.
Quote from: Mr Tees!! on October 26, 2013, 06:25:13 PMWell, looks like may be replacing my compressor... OK, soooo...Diamondback is rated to consume 19cfm @ 100psi.Current compressor is 7.5hp, 80gal tank,rated to deliver 23.1cfm @ the full 175 PSI http://www.grainger.com/Grainger/SPEEDAIRE-Electric-Air-Compressor-4XA60Looking at this one locally, also 7.5hp, 80gal tank, but rated at 24.3cfm @ 90psi, but max pressure at 175. http://www.tractorsupply.com/en/store/ingersoll-randreg%3B-75-hp-80-gallon-two-stage-air-compressorNow, does the CFM delivery offset the psi here? the max pressure on the Ingersoll unit is also 175, so I think it keeps the pressure at a range well above what the press consumes. Is there any reason this wouldn't work? Pros, cons?FYI, not worried about future expansion in this case...next press in the business plan will be servo-based and consume less air anyway.Thanks!!as you increase the psi the CFO goes down. The one you are looking at should be fine. Set the compressor to run to 110-115 and start at 95-100
Quote from: 244 on October 26, 2013, 07:41:01 PMQuote from: Mr Tees!! on October 26, 2013, 06:25:13 PMWell, looks like may be replacing my compressor... OK, soooo...Diamondback is rated to consume 19cfm @ 100psi.Current compressor is 7.5hp, 80gal tank,rated to deliver 23.1cfm @ the full 175 PSI http://www.grainger.com/Grainger/SPEEDAIRE-Electric-Air-Compressor-4XA60Looking at this one locally, also 7.5hp, 80gal tank, but rated at 24.3cfm @ 90psi, but max pressure at 175. http://www.tractorsupply.com/en/store/ingersoll-randreg%3B-75-hp-80-gallon-two-stage-air-compressorNow, does the CFM delivery offset the psi here? the max pressure on the Ingersoll unit is also 175, so I think it keeps the pressure at a range well above what the press consumes. Is there any reason this wouldn't work? Pros, cons?FYI, not worried about future expansion in this case...next press in the business plan will be servo-based and consume less air anyway.Thanks!!as you increase the psi the CFO goes down. The one you are looking at should be fine. Set the compressor to run to 110-115 and start at 95-100...thanks for the reply, Rich! The IR is the one I ended up with, and we are going to repair the old unit and use as a backup, as well as utilizing the tank for extra air storage....IF I lower the cutoff/cut-on specs to what you have suggested, wouldn't that cause the motor to run more frequently? I notice that this new unit already cycles more frequently, with a 175/145 cycle. We did some rough timing, and running the press even at a slow pace the compressor runs for 60 sec and then cuts off for 130 sec. I would like to lower the running-time if possible...any suggestions? I don't much at all about this stuff, and could be missing something for sure. Educate me please, I need it!