Author Topic: Film  (Read 15559 times)

Offline mk162

  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 7866
Film
« on: June 22, 2011, 07:36:57 AM »
What brand film do most of you guys use?  Also, is it waterproof or non?

I don't care for the frosted look of the stuff I use now, and I am thinking about changing.  I see that Chromaline has like 4 different films and frankly, their website stinks when it comes to the benefits of each.


Offline Homer

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3211
Re: Film
« Reply #1 on: June 22, 2011, 08:26:51 AM »
Fixxons, WP film, 13"x18" 81.00. Nazdar has the same for 85.00, Film direct was 87ish I think, Garston is getting it to me for 85 -originally 112.00. . .WP all the way, no comparison.
...keep doing what you're doing, you'll only get what you've got...

Offline blue moon

  • Administrator
  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6368
Re: Film
« Reply #2 on: June 22, 2011, 08:54:01 AM »
i was having issues with clear film and was forced to switch to WP. We use the house brand which I think is Kimoto. More expensive, but it works. I'll eventually try some more, but currently the time is better spent on other things. I'll tackle the things that work later. . .
Yes, we've won our share of awards, and yes, I've tested stuff and read the scientific papers, but ultimately take everything I say with more than just a grain of salt! So if you are looking for trouble, just do as I say or even better, do something I said years ago!

Offline Clark

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 265
Re: Film
« Reply #3 on: June 22, 2011, 09:10:40 AM »
Fixxons 13x19 and 24" Rolls. Great stuff and can't beat the price.

Offline Denis Kolar

  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2871
Re: Film
« Reply #4 on: June 22, 2011, 09:49:54 AM »
Fixxons 13x19 WP   $86 with shipping

Offline mk162

  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 7866
Re: Film
« Reply #5 on: June 22, 2011, 10:32:19 AM »
Ok, so I just checked the Dmin and Dmax of the film i ma using now.  It's around .03 on the Dmin and only 2.48 on the Dmax.  I should be over 3 at minimum.  I think it's the pigment based inks on WP film that is bad.

After checking a very old piece of Non-WP, I am going to try switching back.  The d-min on that was .01 but the dmax was only 2.2, of course I ha to peel it off the back of another film.

I'll post more results.

Offline inkman996

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3760
Re: Film
« Reply #6 on: June 22, 2011, 12:01:55 PM »
How are you checking the densities?
"No man is an island"

Offline Northland

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 622
Re: Film
« Reply #7 on: June 22, 2011, 12:15:16 PM »
I think the RIP is a bigger piece of the story.... but WP film for sure (fixon's or Accufast)

Offline blue moon

  • Administrator
  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6368
Re: Film
« Reply #8 on: June 22, 2011, 12:18:29 PM »
I just checked,

WP film Dmin is 0.025 Dmax is at 3.03.

Printed last week on EPSON 3000 with inks from compandsave.com ($5.99 ea) using FM V3 at double density.
Film is from Multicraft, but I think it is Kimoto. About $140 for 13x19 (yes, I know it is expensive!).

pierre
Yes, we've won our share of awards, and yes, I've tested stuff and read the scientific papers, but ultimately take everything I say with more than just a grain of salt! So if you are looking for trouble, just do as I say or even better, do something I said years ago!

Offline mk162

  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 7866
Re: Film
« Reply #9 on: June 22, 2011, 12:39:32 PM »
With a pocket densitometer.  I have a friend from the offset side that has nifty tools.

I am going to try regular film, I bet it will be better.  2.49 isn't good enough.

Offline Sbrem

  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 6056
Re: Film
« Reply #10 on: June 22, 2011, 12:47:17 PM »
Fixxons 13x19 WP   $86 with shipping

Ditto on Fixxons 13 x 19...

Steve

Pierre, Fixxons will send you some free sample sheets to try. They remind me of photo film, of which I shot and processed about a million sheets, but, I don't have the densitometer to measure it.
« Last Edit: June 22, 2011, 12:50:39 PM by Sbrem »
I made a mistake once; I thought I was wrong about something; I wasn't

Offline inkman996

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3760
Re: Film
« Reply #11 on: June 22, 2011, 02:16:30 PM »
Brad I will see if I can get one of our local off setters to test our film, I know of one that has densometer but it is not portable.

Question is what is an ideal DMAX to shoot for? Has anyone published or discussed a good dmin dmax ratio?
"No man is an island"

Offline blue moon

  • Administrator
  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6368
Re: Film
« Reply #12 on: June 22, 2011, 03:03:35 PM »
Brad I will see if I can get one of our local off setters to test our film, I know of one that has densometer but it is not portable.

Question is what is an ideal DMAX to shoot for? Has anyone published or discussed a good dmin dmax ratio?

my understanding is 3.0 is considered sufficient for screen printing. Douglas should be able to chime in with tested data.
Yes, we've won our share of awards, and yes, I've tested stuff and read the scientific papers, but ultimately take everything I say with more than just a grain of salt! So if you are looking for trouble, just do as I say or even better, do something I said years ago!

Offline Homer

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3211
Re: Film
« Reply #13 on: June 22, 2011, 03:54:17 PM »
ok -I'll be the dumbass as usual - what are you guys talking about? the thickness of the film?
...keep doing what you're doing, you'll only get what you've got...

Offline inkman996

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 3760
Re: Film
« Reply #14 on: June 22, 2011, 04:28:44 PM »
No the density of the ink. Dmin is how much light is blocked, ie the clear part of the film, and Dmax is how much light is let through, ie where the ink is.
"No man is an island"