Author Topic: film: waterproof vs non  (Read 6758 times)

Offline Shanarchy

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1421
film: waterproof vs non
« on: February 14, 2013, 03:05:07 PM »
What is your film of choice? I've been using waterproof film from Faxxon's for a while. It's a good quality film.

I've been thinking though that non-waterproof film, being more clear, must have a better dmax/dmin or whatever you gauge it by. Would it be safe to assume that non-waterproof film would give the best results for halftones?



Offline JayzTeez

  • !!!
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 373
  • Manual Screen Printer
Re: film: waterproof vs non
« Reply #1 on: February 14, 2013, 03:09:06 PM »
I use waterproof film from inkjetfilm.net 
Jayz Teez Screen Printing
Houtzdale, PA.

Offline Frog

  • Administrator
  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13980
  • Docendo discimus
Re: film: waterproof vs non
« Reply #2 on: February 14, 2013, 03:12:36 PM »
Short answer, yes, if dot shape and d-max is at least equal, a lower d-min is desirable.
However, the coating on the "waterproof" films is often more receptive to a wider range of inks.
That rug really tied the room together, did it not?

Offline ebscreen

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4278
Re: film: waterproof vs non
« Reply #3 on: February 14, 2013, 03:25:47 PM »
Used to use non-waterproof when waterproof was 2x the cost.

Then everything switched around. Now I can't find a non-waterproof
that works worth a damn.

Offline jsheridan

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2130
Re: film: waterproof vs non
« Reply #4 on: February 14, 2013, 03:37:10 PM »
It depends on the ink in your printer.

Pigment base works best on waterproof while dye inks work best on non-water proof,

I use dye and non-water proof because I don't like the cloudiness of w-proof films, that and tape leaves a residue.

Just don't get ur non wterproof films wet or the dye will run.
Blacktop Graphics Screenprinting and Consulting Services

Offline mavgraph

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
Re: film: waterproof vs non
« Reply #5 on: February 14, 2013, 04:06:12 PM »
It depends on the ink in your printer.

Pigment base works best on waterproof while dye inks work best on non-water proof,

I use dye and non-water proof because I don't like the cloudiness of w-proof films, that and tape leaves a residue.

Just don't get ur non wterproof films wet or the dye will run.

He is right. I have some customers who only use non, and others who only use WP. It's all about the ink
Brad
Maverick Graphic Supply 877-MAVERIK brad@maverickgraphicsupply.com
www.maverickgraphicsupply.com
Your #1 Choice For Inkjet and Laser Film
Adopt a Beagle! www.brewbeagles.org

Offline Shanarchy

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1421
Re: film: waterproof vs non
« Reply #6 on: February 14, 2013, 04:34:05 PM »
Good point, John. I probably should have mentioned I use an Epson 1400 (dye based).

Which non-wp film are you using?

Offline Shanarchy

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1421
Re: film: waterproof vs non
« Reply #7 on: February 14, 2013, 04:35:04 PM »

[/quote]

He is right. I have some customers who only use non, and others who only use WP. It's all about the ink
[/quote]

Mav,

You sell both, which do you recommend for halftones on an Epson 1400 (dye based)

Offline Screened Gear

  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2580
Re: film: waterproof vs non
« Reply #8 on: February 14, 2013, 04:39:05 PM »

Just don't get ur non wterproof films wet or the dye will run.


I posted this a while back. My non waterproof film after about 8 hours can handle just about anything.  Its Kimoto Silkjet film. I use a canon printer.  I have sprayed screen opener on them and the ink did not run or come off. Really amazing since screen opener will eat just about everything.

Here is the origianl thread....
http://www.theshirtboard.com/index.php/topic,2707.0.html

Offline mavgraph

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 168
Re: film: waterproof vs non
« Reply #9 on: February 14, 2013, 04:49:03 PM »
Shanarchy,

The Kimoto Silkjet SC4 is the best stuff for dye based. If u need some samples let me know
Brad
Maverick Graphic Supply 877-MAVERIK brad@maverickgraphicsupply.com
www.maverickgraphicsupply.com
Your #1 Choice For Inkjet and Laser Film
Adopt a Beagle! www.brewbeagles.org

Offline jsheridan

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2130
Re: film: waterproof vs non
« Reply #10 on: February 14, 2013, 06:09:11 PM »
Good point, John. I probably should have mentioned I use an Epson 1400 (dye based).

Which non-wp film are you using?

I'm using film from stuff for printers. Its the same film someone else sells here for about the same price, I'm paying $61 per 17" roll.

Its good film, haven't had to many stretching issue and combined with blackmax dye ink and refill carts I've kept my costs to about .65 cents per foot of film.

Blacktop Graphics Screenprinting and Consulting Services

Offline JBLUE

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2036
Re: film: waterproof vs non
« Reply #11 on: February 14, 2013, 06:34:24 PM »
Different films have different dot gain when they print. So you should find one that has the least amount of dot gain when doing half tones if you have not linearized your printer or cant linearize your printer. It does make a difference on which film you use. Price should not be the focal point.
www.inkwerksspd.com

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid...... Ben Franklin

Offline sportsshoppe

  • !!!
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 649
  • A way of life.
Re: film: waterproof vs non
« Reply #12 on: February 15, 2013, 03:58:36 PM »
Waterproof --- Epson 3000
non WP seems to want to run I got a roll for cheap !!

Offline JBLUE

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2036
Re: film: waterproof vs non
« Reply #13 on: February 15, 2013, 06:07:00 PM »
You have to adjust your droplet weight.
www.inkwerksspd.com

We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid...... Ben Franklin

Offline jsheridan

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2130
Re: film: waterproof vs non
« Reply #14 on: February 16, 2013, 12:40:15 PM »
the least amount of dot gain when doing half tones if you have not linearized your printer or cant linearize your printer.

This can't be stressed enough. Stock Epson printers, heck any brand tend to have heavy gain in the midtone range and fill solid above 75% as their main use was not intended for what we as printers need, accurate and perfectly produced halftones to burn a screen vs art on the wall.

Anyone who is even thinking of printing 1/2 tones really needs to calibrate and Linearize their RIP settings.

Accurip and Wasatch users, maybe other rips, allow you to enter tonal readings to produce accurate halftones from YOUR printer.
My old Epson R1800 was producing and exposing 3% tones on a 272 mesh.

You need a densitometer, go buy one or ask around to borrow as some have one. 
Blacktop Graphics Screenprinting and Consulting Services