"He who marches out of step hears another drum." ~ Ken Kesey
Quote from: Screened Gear on November 30, 2012, 05:34:43 PMThat is not entirely true. If the post office was removed or failed. There would be a ton of packages that need to be shipped to Afghanistan. Now Fedex knows they can't compete in that market so they just don't. If it was a fair market they would have deals and transports to handle that area. With fair competition comes lower costs to the customer with out a need for subsidizing. What the gov is doing is making areas where Competition is not driving pricing and the need for better practices and technology. Competition is what gives the customer choices to pick the winners based on performance not by how many people will lose jobs if they fail. Its what american business was founded on and what made this country so great.No... what the Post Office does, in many cases, is something that private enterprise doesn't want a part of.No private company wants to deliver a birthday card from Broken Spoke, Montana to Blackwater, Mississippi for $.49They might do it for $4.90... but not $.49So it's not a case of customers choosing winning businesses... it would be a case of businesses choosing winning customers.I going to take a guess at something..... you probably shipped shirts to a US serviceman.The Postal service is based on helping citizens stay connected... it's part of their business model to honor that premise.So, I guess in this case the connection between you and your customer was subsidized (by default) by some other customer.It's not about what's "fair"... it's about what is good for a society.Yes.... competition helps make America "great"... but so do many other practices, like a fully functioning Postal Service.
That is not entirely true. If the post office was removed or failed. There would be a ton of packages that need to be shipped to Afghanistan. Now Fedex knows they can't compete in that market so they just don't. If it was a fair market they would have deals and transports to handle that area. With fair competition comes lower costs to the customer with out a need for subsidizing. What the gov is doing is making areas where Competition is not driving pricing and the need for better practices and technology. Competition is what gives the customer choices to pick the winners based on performance not by how many people will lose jobs if they fail. Its what american business was founded on and what made this country so great.
Most schools, police departments, fire departments, etc. lose a boatload of money too......But I doubt many would want to privatize them....Most Post Offices in the world have their issues, however, because a portion of the demographic they serve would be totally left out in a private sector model, I think it is best if the Post Office continues to operate.....
Quote from: royster13 on November 30, 2012, 09:41:13 PMMost schools, police departments, fire departments, etc. lose a boatload of money too......But I doubt many would want to privatize them....Most Post Offices in the world have their issues, however, because a portion of the demographic they serve would be totally left out in a private sector model, I think it is best if the Post Office continues to operate.....Agreed, but these are state and local operations, and thus the states are able to sortof "compete" with each other at some level, and the better ideas emerge and evolve. The feds foul up everything they touch, and if we were truly constitutional, the federal government should field armies and protect our borders, and that's about it. But that's all theoretical and isn't EVER gonna happen.