Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
Quote from: BBB on June 02, 2011, 02:24:55 PMSeems to me, the problem with the OLD (TSPMB) board wasn't "a person who won't be named"..people could be banned, or ignored. If they were banned so be it. The problem arose when he CONTROLED it and it became his and his ways, EVERYONE else was banned. There was no Control of the forum. There is now. NO BANS, or Exclutions unless warranted. The control of the forum is up to the "Head Guys"...they do their job, everything is smooth. Banning can be appropriate, but a sin should be commited..My 2 centsWell said, Bill.I'm against any and all censorship, period. I don't even like it when it auto-censors dirty words. I put up with it in these private forums, because it's ultimately up to the owners what the forum should be about, not me... but frankly I find the idea that someone can decide what I should see and hear far more offensive than anything anyone can post. (Even SicGrafix)!Are-Double-ewe-Bee (stop pussyfooting and just let us SAY it... I can't even type it without your stupid auto-correct...) was damaging to TSPMB. More than just a troll, he was almost as bad as an all-out hacker. I totally understand not letting him here just because of that. But now someone's started a LIST of people not allowed to post? In the words of Han Solo, "I have a bad feeling about this."NotGood
Seems to me, the problem with the OLD (TSPMB) board wasn't "a person who won't be named"..people could be banned, or ignored. If they were banned so be it. The problem arose when he CONTROLED it and it became his and his ways, EVERYONE else was banned. There was no Control of the forum. There is now. NO BANS, or Exclutions unless warranted. The control of the forum is up to the "Head Guys"...they do their job, everything is smooth. Banning can be appropriate, but a sin should be commited..My 2 cents
It's always good to know both sides of the story, and I was lucky enough to get that today. I have to say, there may be more facts to the matter than I was privy to. I found out that there may be reasons that this decision may be a good one for the admins of this board, even if it may not appear to be a good one for the users.
I say we invite Bill and get on with life.
There was one thread on the M&R boards where a guy, Scrimshaw I thinkasked Bill if he could see a sample of this famed one-hit white, to see whathe was aiming for, and what was really possible. Bill tore him a new one justfor asking. That's bullshit. You don't purport something to the Nth degree andthen criticize when asked for proof.
While I allowed him to stay , they left and so in essence my forum members lost out on the support that these professionals could of offered.
I am a guest of Andy's here.