I think this particular piece of art would have been better served on a 135/48. Same thread thickness as here but, holy jesus, does a 135 throw ink. Tension may come into play though as the 135 S can't quite take as much as the 150 S in terms of n/cm.
{Out of the three counts with 48 micron threads- 135, 150, 180 -the 135 is by far the most delicate. It would appear there's 'strength in numbers' regarding tpi and screen failure.}
And when I say tension may come into play I've noticed that you have got to be deadly accurate with your fill and stroke using the 135 S. Too much pressure and you will indeed have a very self defeating thick stencil with tons of open area plowing uneven slabs of ink onto your garments in part of the image and laying it down just on top in other image areas. I don't know how you all printing HD deal with those super skinny thread/low tpi screens with the sky high EOM. I feel like you'd have to have a spit polished and fine tuned masterpiece of an auto press to get the repeatability needed and probably still have to deal with ink dilatentcy and other little rheological changes the whole way.
Anyways I agree with 'ol cloudy here, probably going to have issues with the big open areas and need a p/f/p and that will likely be way too much ink unless you want a little mini HD look, which can be cool done right but maybe not so cool all over your chest while you play sports.