Computers and Software > Separation Programs

Separation software dilema

(1/9) > >>

Denis Kolar:
Hi there. More questions from me.
Which separation software are you using and what do you like about it?
I was looking at Ultra Sept, T-Seps, Quick seps, Wilflex Easy Art......... No particular order.
I'm thinking about pulling the trigger and buying something. It is not that I will be doing a lot if advanced stuff, but if I could save 10-20 hours in next year, I would be ready to spend few hundred bucks.

Please do not answer "I use Dan", or "I use My Seps guy" or something like that. I know that Dan and other guys are great, but I need something that I can access at any time ag get the seps in few minutes. If something more complicated comes up, I will give them a call and outsource printing to someone else if the order is bigger.  ( ;) P)

Thanks

jason-23:
Dan is the best at what he does in the sep world. Quick seps plug in for photoshop works pretty dang good with some adjustments here and there.

Frog:
Don't all of the options besides Dan offer a free trial?

tpitman:
QuikSeps Pro. Can't say that it's better or worse than the others, as it's the only one I've ever used. I originally bought it new off eBay for $150, when Fresener was selling his product for substantially more. The one thing Fresener's latest set of actions are alleged to have are process on dark shirts, which I've pulled off in tests, but it'd be nice to have something quick and dirty to use if only for a good starting place. The one thing I'd like to see is stochastic process color plug-ins or actions for Photoshop with an underbase and highlight.

mk162:
I use easyart and quik seps.  There are features of both I like better than the other.  Overall, EasyArt is easier to use.

But, even owning both of those programs...I use dan.  I don't have to jack around with the prints once they are on the press.  Set it up and done.  It's a matter of how much your time is worth.

If I had the time, I'd learn how to better sep

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

Go to full version