Means if you do it digitally then the flipped image won't register with the tri-loc since it's only on one corner of the screen.
However you are saying to flip the screen and flip the triloc on press so you would be registering to the same point, front left for the fist image, turn the screen around and back right of screen for second image. But how would an operator know what is the correct way for triloc, my hunch like many places is triloc rarely gets used since it doesn't work that great and operators will think they are faster without it.
I don't get the ROI on these, for the price I would prefer to get a wax or inkjet model and a press which would have a much better ROI than the steep cost of just a laser. It looks like the "Screen Cube" is similar to the CST which has been around in Europe for a long time, a single laser that scans
https://luescher.com/en/product-lines/screen-cubehttps://www.c-s-t.de/en/flat-exposure/Most people are printing spot colors on gildans for pennies, if you think you are going to be printing 80+lpi on a gildan you need to get real. So how does a 150k laser make sense is beyond me.
If it's worth it, post your work in here
https://www.theshirtboard.com/index.php/topic,73.3285.html otherwise I don't think that laser to screen is worth it for the price point, and there is a point where it wouldn't even make a difference since hybrid would be better than screen printing ever be at a certain point, also for a relatively similar cost as a Screen Cube.