Hey,
I've been having a lot of issues lately with Gildan Hammer shirts and re-dyes. As you can see from my image, the shirt on the right is a re-dyed blue shirt. Of course I didn't notice until a dozen of them were in the dryer.
As far as I know, the manufactures don't let the suppliers know when they've been sent re-dyed shirts. Due to that, there's no way for the supplier to keep track and separate de-dyes from regulars. The only way to find out what's what is to have the print shops waste a bunch of shirts. Yes, the suppliers tell shops to always test the print, but I'm not going to test a print on every sized shirt to make sure that it's not a re-dye. That's just wasteful.
My questions is, can we do anything to prevent this? Can we, as an industry, talk to our suppliers and ask them to work out a system with the manufactures? I feel like our industry is moving in two directions: DTG and Waterbase printing. With so many shops moving into discharge printing, it seems like this re-dye issue needs to be dealt with sooner than later. I've already sent an email to S&S to see what they can do. If this is a problem for other shops out there, I urge you to talk to your supplier. It doesn't seem like it would be that hard for companies like Gildan and Hanes to separately and label cases that contain re-dyes.
Maybe I'm asking for too much, idk.