Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
Quote from: alan802 on December 21, 2011, 04:38:56 PMThe WR 25 worked fine but damn did it take a long time to expose. The first one I did at 23 light units, for context a chromablue in that mesh count would have been at 7 light units, and it was extremely underexposed to where I couldn't use it and had to burn another one. I did the next one at 30 light units and it was still underexposed but I was able to use it. After I washed it out successfully, I post exposed it for another 30 light units so it would hold up on the press.What cell speed do you use for the light units on your Richmond? ..out of curiosity...
The WR 25 worked fine but damn did it take a long time to expose. The first one I did at 23 light units, for context a chromablue in that mesh count would have been at 7 light units, and it was extremely underexposed to where I couldn't use it and had to burn another one. I did the next one at 30 light units and it was still underexposed but I was able to use it. After I washed it out successfully, I post exposed it for another 30 light units so it would hold up on the press.
Likely not the hardener, but an underexposed screen. Even a non-water resistant emulsion without hardenershould holdup to at least 50 impressions.Post expose in the sun or exposure unit, wipe hardener on completely dry screen, let dry completely.
Quote from: squeegee on December 21, 2011, 05:16:34 PMQuote from: alan802 on December 21, 2011, 04:38:56 PMThe WR 25 worked fine but damn did it take a long time to expose. The first one I did at 23 light units, for context a chromablue in that mesh count would have been at 7 light units, and it was extremely underexposed to where I couldn't use it and had to burn another one. I did the next one at 30 light units and it was still underexposed but I was able to use it. After I washed it out successfully, I post exposed it for another 30 light units so it would hold up on the press.What cell speed do you use for the light units on your Richmond? ..out of curiosity...It's set at 2. I have no idea what is optimal for that and I've never messed with that setting. Any recommendations or comments on cell speed?
Quote from: mattleague on December 21, 2011, 03:14:24 PMI heard cci swr-3 is a great emulsion too. Anyone use it. Would be ideal I guess along with their dischargeThe WR-25 is better. Holds better detail and is easier to reclaim. The SWR-3 is satanically hard to reclaim.
I heard cci swr-3 is a great emulsion too. Anyone use it. Would be ideal I guess along with their discharge
Alan, I did some black 100% cotton with a brite blue ink plasticharge and it looks great very bright...I'll try to post a pic, my samsung is taking crappy pics for some reason...reason could be me LOL