Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
Look at assorted presses, but M&R is great, with great service. It's indeed time. Keep that workhorse for the smaller easier 1 & 2 color short runs... Steve
I'd definitely recommend you go to a few trade shows between now and then to see what's available. We'll be at ISS Fort Worth (September), SGIA (October), and ISS Long Beach (January) for sure so those are the three I know of.
Why not ask Workhorse what is there best production press and compare that to what you think M&R has a good production press, you just might get a better deal from Workhorse unless you just got you heart set on blue.
Quote from: 3Deep on July 25, 2018, 05:36:16 PMWhy not ask Workhorse what is there best production press and compare that to what you think M&R has a good production press, you just might get a better deal from Workhorse unless you just got you heart set on blue. It’s not that I have my heart set on Blue, it’s the blue is tested and proven. I bought the Cutlass when it was new and it had a lot of problems it needed to work through.The Sabre is their equivalent to the Sportsman, but as I talk with people who run Sabres, they all fall in the 500 pieces per hour. I’m not looking to crush any world records, but I am looking to hit higher numbers than what I have heard Sabre owners say they hit.I also have talked with owners of Sabres who also run older Sportsman presses, and those still out perform the Sabre.I know the guys at Workhorse, and they are great dudes, but I’m looking at numbers here. Like I said, I’ve seen the shops with my own eyes that produce the numbers I want to hit, and all of the presses are M&R.
Happy with our Sabre for the most part, but even after only 3ish months with it, I feel like we have hit its limits when it comes to production speed. We regularly run it at 58 dozen, but can't ever really break 60 dozen on anything but tiny neck labels. Loading it is also a chore due to the way their pallet arms are made, where the pallets are basically 4 inches up and shirts regularly catch on the rectangular end of the pallet arm itself. Loading any shirt below an XL, especially fitted shirts, is basically a two step motion instead of one to clear the arm below the pallet. Still, MUCH better than manual printing
This brings back the question of, does the print quality suffer above 500/hour or x amount per hour? I guess it really depends on how good the loader is, but I would fear crooked prints any higher then 600/hour.