Author Topic: imprint size vs pallet size?  (Read 1247 times)

Offline Prince Art

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 793
imprint size vs pallet size?
« on: March 09, 2018, 10:25:48 AM »
Curious to know: How close to the edge of the pallets do you run your prints? And is it the same on auto & manual? How does amount of margin on each side affect printing (or does it)?

I'm contemplating some custom pallets to get as close to our maximum print width as possible, & trim out any excess pallet width. Goal is to change pallets less often by accommodating more small shirt sizes. I just want to make sure I'm leaving enough margin, & not doing something that will compromise printing ease or quality.
Nice guys laugh last.


Offline blue moon

  • Administrator
  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6366
Re: imprint size vs pallet size?
« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2018, 11:48:00 AM »
I don't think the amount of margin makes a difference.

pierre
Yes, we've won our share of awards, and yes, I've tested stuff and read the scientific papers, but ultimately take everything I say with more than just a grain of salt! So if you are looking for trouble, just do as I say or even better, do something I said years ago!

Offline Frog

  • Administrator
  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13980
  • Docendo discimus
Re: imprint size vs pallet size?
« Reply #2 on: March 09, 2018, 11:58:40 AM »
Yep, more important is hitting the sweet spot of the screen with your image size.
That rug really tied the room together, did it not?

Offline mimosatexas

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4221
  • contributor
Re: imprint size vs pallet size?
« Reply #3 on: March 09, 2018, 03:33:18 PM »
I print on the standard 16x22 (which it was 16x25ish).  I print up to 15x21 with some frequency..,

On my press (Kruzer) I can fit most womens cut (except S and M bella/next level) and most youth (though American Apparel Smalls are tight). 

Offline ZooCity

  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4914
Re: imprint size vs pallet size?
« Reply #4 on: March 09, 2018, 05:17:04 PM »
I like +2" over the image width so an inch on each side of the platen in to the image.  But we'll often print up to 1" over the image width or half an inch on each side of the platen.

We round the corners of all our blades and since the blade width is matched to the rest of the tooling this gives some wiggle room.

I also don't like printing near the max blade width for a bunch of nerdy reasons that I think Joe Clarke explains best in his material.  We'll print a 15" w. image on the next size platen and screen up for those reasons.

Offline Prince Art

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 793
Re: imprint size vs pallet size?
« Reply #5 on: March 09, 2018, 10:47:19 PM »
Yep, more important is hitting the sweet spot of the screen with your image size.

You know, I remember seeing the math on how to find that once. In a thread here, I believe. I don't think we're having problems in that area, but I might search for that for the added knowledge.


I like hearing that most of you don't consider the margin a big concern. Zoo's comment about squeegees brings up another couple of questions: How far past the max image width should the squeegee extend? And should the squeegee be shorter than the pallet width, and if so, by how much? Or is overlapping fine? (I tend to think overlapping is asking for press lines & unecessary wear on squeegee, screen, and stencil.) Not asking about what obviously CAN be done, but what's generally GOOD (without going overboard into "in a perfect world" theoretical territory).
« Last Edit: March 09, 2018, 11:00:27 PM by Prince Art »
Nice guys laugh last.