DTS alternatives and status

[Sbrem]

Wow, long thread. I wouldn't want him banned, though I admit I probably wouldn't invite him to my home for a party either. But he's pretty bright, and has some good things to say intertwined in there. But yes, he has a disregard for others that I'm not sure he is completely aware of, or if he is, should really cut it the hell out. Insulting people who have already done some very fine work indeed is not a way to win friends and influence people. Sharing knowledge is one thing, trying to use it as a bludgeon is another. Good luck to you, I hope all goes well for you and yours.

Steve

[inkman996]

I agree I wouldn't have banned either, but if he asked for it to be so then whatever

[LoneWolf2]

What a jackass...

[Gilligan]

I think he provides a different way of looking at things.  I do think you guys are splitting hairs over this 50% thing.  I mean, polarizing glasses for example only block out "100%" of the light coming from PERCICELY the right direction... off that axis by a few degrees and it's coming through, just not as strong.  So 50% might be too definite.  Just like my 100% above is probably not correct either.

[Steve Harpold]

I am bummed there was all sort of cool science stuff stuck in the middle of relatively entertaining insults! It was the science equivalent of the rumble in the jungle! We had wiki references and at least 5  different links to fun cool applications, with a little capulet vs montague  sizzle!! I guess it probably got a little out of hand, but each time all parties involved got smarter and backed there research with videos, interactive diagrams and life experiences! I guess I will go back to re runs of mash

[jvanick]

I want to know when we can have quantum screens.  Change the state of the emulsion so it's open or closed in each "cell".



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

[Maxie]

Pierre why ban.
Just stop answering.

[inkman996]

I want to know when we can have quantum screens.  Change the state of the emulsion so it's open or closed in each "cell".



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Problem is any entangled cell would have to be in reverse

[Gilligan]

Pierre why ban.
Just stop answering.

Same advice you gave me and another user when we couldn't seem to stop bickering.

[jvanick]

I want to know when we can have quantum screens.  Change the state of the emulsion so it's open or closed in each "cell".



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Problem is any entangled cell would have to be in reverse

wouldn't that just mean 2 screens?  1 screen on press, one screen 'somewhere' that's got all the other halfs of the entangled particles on them?

that's some hard-scifi stuff there... I believe for the entanglement to work, you still need a 'carrier beam'... so you'd end up with 2 screens, connected with fiber optic cable.

[blue moon]

Pierre why ban.
Just stop answering.

Same advice you gave me and another user when we couldn't seem to stop bickering.

not the same, there was misinformation being spread that could hurt ppl not understanding what is going on.

pierre

[Underbase37]

He asked to be ban. Somthing tells me this wasn't the first time he's had this kind of interaction and complete breakdown in people skills.

It's never fair when the hole world is against you and they're all too stupid to understand you.

Good luck with life.

Murphy

[inkman996]

I want to know when we can have quantum screens.  Change the state of the emulsion so it's open or closed in each "cell".



Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk

Problem is any entangled cell would have to be in reverse

wouldn't that just mean 2 screens?  1 screen on press, one screen 'somewhere' that's got all the other halfs of the entangled particles on them?

that's some hard-scifi stuff there... I believe for the entanglement to work, you still need a 'carrier beam'... so you'd end up with 2 screens, connected with fiber optic cable.

The big brains still cannot predict or influence which state a particle is once observed, it can be up or down east west etc. The other particle would be opposite, till they have a break through quantum entanglement is still just a novelty. But imagine if they can influence a particle in one spot, the partner could be on the other side of the universe and we could pass information at iunstant speeds, spooky $crap as Einstein said.

[Stinkhorn Press]

i enjoyed a good catfight.

i'm sad that his instinctual response was so acerbic. because, seconding others, looking past that, he was certainly bringing something to the table.

the concept is intriguing. i'm glad he's pursuing it. yeah, maybe it won't work. but the proof is in the testing, not the guessing from afar.

[mimosatexas]

Just think how this would have gone if he approached it like any other thread on a DIY project, all of which are civil and constructive.