Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
News:
"He who marches out of step hears another drum." ~ Ken Kesey
Home
Forum
Help
Search
Gallery
Articles
Advertise
Login
Register
TSB
»
screen printing
»
Waterbase and Discharge
»
Would have sucked
« previous
next »
Print
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Go Down
Author
Topic: Would have sucked (Read 4732 times)
ZooCity
Gonzo Member
Posts: 4914
Re: Would have sucked
«
Reply #15 on:
June 21, 2016, 01:52:24 AM »
What fixative do you use?
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Logged
DCSP John
Sr. Member
Posts: 340
Re: Would have sucked
«
Reply #16 on:
June 21, 2016, 07:51:33 AM »
Second that.. What fixer are you using for the Rutland WB system?
Would love to know... Fiber lock does not do it.
John
Logged
JBLUE
!!!
Gonzo Member
Posts: 2036
Re: Would have sucked
«
Reply #17 on:
June 21, 2016, 03:15:38 PM »
Matsui Fixer-N. If you use the F then you have a pot life on the ink which is a waste.
Logged
www.inkwerksspd.com
We are all born ignorant, but one must work hard to remain stupid...... Ben Franklin
tonypep
Ludicrous Speed Member
Posts: 5683
Re: Would have sucked
«
Reply #18 on:
June 21, 2016, 03:29:19 PM »
I use zero additives.......unless you count water
Logged
tpepitone@jnjapparel.net
ZooCity
Gonzo Member
Posts: 4914
Re: Would have sucked
«
Reply #19 on:
June 21, 2016, 04:35:00 PM »
Ok, we use Fixer WF-N with Matsui HSA here, no issues dropping it into Rutland WB-99?
I'll check into this, anything to further help the wash process is alright by me.
Logged
Print
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Go Up
« previous
next »
TSB
»
screen printing
»
Waterbase and Discharge
»
Would have sucked