Opportunity is missed by most people because it is dressed in overalls and looks like work. - Thomas Edison
One more question, aside from production speed, is there an advantage of two heads over one with the imager? Is there better durability with dual heads?
Quote from: Alex M on June 02, 2016, 08:03:46 PMWe do indeed Sent me you email and I will send you a linkSent from my iPhone using TapatalkReally? For tiny screens? These are like 9x16 frames...
We do indeed Sent me you email and I will send you a linkSent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: Evo on June 06, 2016, 02:30:50 PMQuote from: Alex M on June 02, 2016, 08:03:46 PMWe do indeed Sent me you email and I will send you a linkSent from my iPhone using TapatalkReally? For tiny screens? These are like 9x16 frames...Yup, as small as 8x10.Have not tried smaller but do not see why we could not build a jig for it.Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Quote from: Evo on June 06, 2016, 02:32:31 PMOne more question, aside from production speed, is there an advantage of two heads over one with the imager? Is there better durability with dual heads? Strictly for speed. All else remains the same. They are not redundant as they work in unison and cannot be fired separately.
Quote from: 244 on June 06, 2016, 03:15:42 PMQuote from: Evo on June 06, 2016, 02:32:31 PMOne more question, aside from production speed, is there an advantage of two heads over one with the imager? Is there better durability with dual heads? Strictly for speed. All else remains the same. They are not redundant as they work in unison and cannot be fired separately.Just a thought- if you could work it out in the firmware and rip to allow these units to fire on 1, 2 or 3 heads that might be a nice competitive advantage since shops running I image units would have a little built in redundancy on the print heads.
Author
Topic: i-Image STE or STE II? and diazo (Read 4609 times)
