General > Action Engineering

Manual Roller Squeegee Example

(1/2) > >>

Action1:

We have Tee-rriffic News!

We have now heard from reputable sources that the Manual Roller Squeegee is working as hoped. I have to say that I was wrong about this product. It was my position for the last year that it wouldn't work because of the speed and pressure that the automatics can produce is more than we can do by hand.

However - I was flat out wrong. They work. Here's an example of the difference between a print which is manually smoothed and a traditional print with no smoothing.


Action Engineering, Inc.
www.actionengineering.com
Manual Roller Squeegees - http://www.actionengineering.com/cat-24-1-1136/click-for-our-newest-products.htm

Prosperi-Tees:
Want to bump this thread to see if anyone is using this? In the pic posted even after rolling it is not an acceptable print in my eyes. Also do you move the flash to the last station instead of the first on a manual press?, I would imagine so.

3Deep:
Don't know Gerry I will say doing it by hand that looks really good to me, I wouldn't have a problem at all with that coming from a manual press using the roller.

Prosperi-Tees:
I guess I could look at it in a different way. The improvement in the pic was great and if you can print and get it to look like the post roller print in the first place that the improvement post roller from that would be even better.

Nation03:
I've been curious on how the setup works for this. Do you need to run 2 flashes to be efficient? I feel like it may be too slow of a process for manual printers. It would be quicker to heat seal the shirt afterwards, no?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page