Author Topic: Water Based Vs. Plastisol  (Read 2520 times)

Offline JackThrasher

  • Verified/Junior
  • **
  • Posts: 34
Water Based Vs. Plastisol
« on: December 27, 2013, 02:50:27 PM »
I have been working with the Rutland M3 mixing system for the last year and want to Move into water based and discharge. Any recommendations for quality Inks in those Categories?
« Last Edit: December 27, 2013, 02:58:19 PM by JackThrasher »
Jack Thrasher
Owner Operator, The Original Whiskey Gun Clothing
https://www.facebook.com/TheOriginalWhiskeyGun


Offline brandon

  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1709
Re: Water Based Vs. Plastisol
« Reply #1 on: December 27, 2013, 03:26:46 PM »
Yup, Rutland.

Offline TCT

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 2877
Re: Water Based Vs. Plastisol
« Reply #2 on: December 27, 2013, 04:07:26 PM »
We use the Rutland for white, but for everything else we use CCI bases and pigs. It works well for us, but it may be different for you if you are already using their Plastisol system I don't know.
Alex

Hopefully I'll never have to grow up and get a real job...

www.twincitytees.com

Offline head north

  • !!!
  • Verified/Junior
  • **
  • Posts: 92
Re: Water Based Vs. Plastisol
« Reply #3 on: December 27, 2013, 05:03:14 PM »
We use Rutland for white and Sericol Texcharge for everything else.
Scott
Head North Printing
www.headnorthprinting.com

Offline Colin

  • !!!
  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1610
  • Ink and Chemical Product Manager
Re: Water Based Vs. Plastisol
« Reply #4 on: December 27, 2013, 10:45:58 PM »
First real question is:  What kind of dryer do you have to cure your garments through?  How long is the chamber and how wide?
Been in the industry since 1996.  5+ years with QCM Inks.  Been a part of shops of all sizes and abilities both as a printer and as an Artist/separator.  I am now the Ink and Chemical Product Manager at Ryonet.

Offline JackThrasher

  • Verified/Junior
  • **
  • Posts: 34
Re: Water Based Vs. Plastisol
« Reply #5 on: December 28, 2013, 01:08:30 AM »
My HomeBase (garage) shop, as of now I have an Infrared Flash Cure and that's it... I'm looking for a Small economic belt dryer though... just starting out.
Jack Thrasher
Owner Operator, The Original Whiskey Gun Clothing
https://www.facebook.com/TheOriginalWhiskeyGun

Offline GaryG

  • !!!
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 750
Re: Water Based Vs. Plastisol
« Reply #6 on: December 28, 2013, 12:06:18 PM »
Ok for plastisol, but -long- economic or not so economic
dryer for water based system. All Mfg specs are all similar
in this regard for print longevity.

Look deep, older electric dryers are not so expensive.
May go from wall to wall, but essential if first post of thread is
to be achieved. Press on...

Offline tpitman

  • Gonzo Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 1059
Re: Water Based Vs. Plastisol
« Reply #7 on: March 20, 2014, 11:06:18 AM »
I've got a small dryer and I confine waterbased jobs to either heart prints that I can fold the shirts down to get more on the slow-moving belt, or very short runs. It's pretty much the one impediment to doing a lot more waterbased stuff, but I simply don't have the room for a longer dryer.
Work is the curse of the drinking class . . .

Online Frog

  • Administrator
  • Ludicrous Speed Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 13980
  • Docendo discimus
Re: Water Based Vs. Plastisol
« Reply #8 on: March 20, 2014, 11:15:48 AM »
While Jackthrasher's flash unit will never make it at production levels for any type of ink, those with conventional electric belt dryers who wish to try water based inks may want to look into additives which speed curing like Matsui's Fixer. Rutland probably has something similar.

Heck, 20 years ago, I used some Union water based inks that with a catalyst additive would even air dry if one had no dryer.
That rug really tied the room together, did it not?