screen printing > Screen Making
Thickness Gauge???
Screened Gear:
Alan, you are making some huge stencils. I can't imagine making them that thick.
Pierre, I also love the 55/90/55. I have been using it and getting great results. It has a lot more flex and prints really smooth. I have an idea of why. The MHM squeegee holder holds the squeegee much farther down (leaving less exposed squeegee) then on other autos that I have seen. I am guessing this changes the printing ability of the squeegee.
Ok I measured a few screens. I am getting between 6 and 9 percent EOM. I can't imagine having a 20% EOM for spot color jobs. I guess now that I can measure them I need to try a thicker one and see what it does.
squeegee:
I have the mesh thickness and my standard stencil thicknesses recorded for all of my standard mesh. I use my numbers when I alter my coats to make an educated guess on exposure time, or when I bring in a new mesh to get closer the first time. It's also very useful in the same regard with a new emulsion because you can deduce exposure times more quickly with stencil measurements.
Alan and Bimm might appreciate that I brought in some PHW red on their recommendations and got some great results, 550 microns on 135/48 mesh less the mesh thickness (~75 microns), so a ~475 micron stencil for an HD job on Monday. I was blown away at how smooth it dries when coating that thick.
inkbrigade:
--- Quote from: blue moon on August 05, 2011, 12:45:49 PM ---
--- Quote from: alan802 on August 05, 2011, 10:03:50 AM ---I use ours all the time. I tend to shoot for a 12-50% EOM, all depending on what I want the screen to achieve. Standard 156 mesh being used for plastisol on a regular garment, I'd use a 156 with a 20% eom ratio. A white print on a black shirt, I'd use something that has a thicker stencil, 30% or even more. Those percentages I'm throwing out there equal anywhere from 10 micron stencils on higher mesh counts to 200 micron stencils for lower mesh counts used for special prints.
--- End quote ---
I spent a couple of days scouring the internet for the White papers from the ink and emulsion manufacturer's and could not get a precise answer, but my conclusion was that the sim process should be in 7%-10% range and the spot color work around 20%. There are reasons to adjust these numbers and the best example is the white ink on black that Alan is doing. I have some of his samples and they look great. Since talking to him we started coating our 110's (used for single color white on darks) much thicker and are getting significantly better results than before. Additional contributing factor was the 55 triple duro squeegee in combination with the high EOM stencils.
pierre
--- End quote ---
If your looking for EOM specs check this out.
http://www.stretchdevices.com/random-images/Dragon-Specs-07-08.pdf
inkbrigade:
--- Quote from: Screened Gear on August 05, 2011, 07:49:57 PM ---Alan, you are making some huge stencils. I can't imagine making them that thick.
Pierre, I also love the 55/90/55. I have been using it and getting great results. It has a lot more flex and prints really smooth. I have an idea of why. The MHM squeegee holder holds the squeegee much farther down (leaving less exposed squeegee) then on other autos that I have seen. I am guessing this changes the printing ability of the squeegee.
Ok I measured a few screens. I am getting between 6 and 9 percent EOM. I can't imagine having a 20% EOM for spot color jobs. I guess now that I can measure them I need to try a thicker one and see what it does.
--- End quote ---
Use the round edge and coat nice and slow. That's how i get the good EOM.
inkbrigade:
Where are you guys getting the 55/90/55 squeegees at?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version