Computers and Software > Computers and Software - General

separation software which one?

<< < (2/5) > >>

jason-23:

--- Quote from: DKgrafix on August 03, 2011, 09:41:43 PM ---
--- Quote from: blue moon on August 03, 2011, 08:31:46 PM ---yes, Dot Tone Dan.

works better than any software you can afford, you charge the customers for the seps and mark it up so you get a better product and making more money!

You'll also learn a lot more and become a better printer doing that way. Automated software will not tell you what you are doing wrong if you are having issues.

pierre

--- End quote ---

Is there any way to bootleg Dot Tone Dan software. :)

--- End quote ---
you would know....

Frog:
Just to play the devil's advocate here, come on all you Fast Films and Quick Seps users, report in!
Tom P, I know that you like your new(ish) Quick Seps.

Sorry Dan  ;D

inkbrigade:
We really like separation studio
http://www.softwareforscreenprinters.com/separation-studio

tpitman:
The rub with QuikSeps Pro or any of the other programs is, by nature, the program has to engage all situations thrown at it with a fixed set of Pantone colors, so the results will always be the best possible set of seps that the program can calculate based on that fixed set of colors. My own experience is that I've always gone into the channels and made subsequent adjustments to suit myself based on what I saw on my screen. There've been a few instances in which I've had to go in, make a channel change, and run a new piece of film for that separation. In the case of simulated process, you can change the Pantone color and see the results, just as you can with any spot color job in Photoshop, so in that sense you're not strictly limited, but the change will ripple throughout the job if you're just trying to fine-tune one particular area of a dominant color. Depending upon how facile you are with adjusting curves or using the "apply image" feature to the channels, there's quite a bit of fine tuning you can do. Ultimately, it really depends on how much time you're willing to spend mucking about with the file once it's been generated to adjust any shortcomings you perceive.
As for process color, I haven't run that much, and even in that situation I was inclined to adjust curves just a bit. Preston used it a lot and he said he never changed anything, including the white plate, and he printed the entire job wet-on-wet. How close his results were to the original art, I don't know, but he always was happy with the results.
I generally like the program, but recognize it's limitations. I'm also one who will spend an inordinate amount of time screwing around with stuff that sometimes results in some lessons learned, and sometimes results in time wasted. Sometimes the wasted time is the lesson learned (at least until the next time). Using it has expanded my comfort level in working in Photoshop at the channels level, so there is something to be said about that. I will say this: if I took an average job and ran it through QuikSeps with my usual tweaking, and I handed the same job to Dan, and printed both jobs, I would expect Dan's work would look better if for no other reason that he generated a custom palette based on that particular job, coupled with his experience at doing this at the professional level for years. Judging by the comments from those who use his services and the pictures posted on this and other forums, the files he generates are pretty much "plug and play" with great results. As to whether to buy a program, or to use Dan, I guess it depends on how much of your own time you're willing to invest in fine tuning jobs, and whether or not you can bill that time to your client if it runs into hours. It also depends on your familiarity with Photoshop, and how satisfied you will be with the results the program yields. Finally, it depends upon how critical a match to the original needs to be. I don't know of anyone who uses this or any of the other programs that doesn't make changes to the generated files. Your press limitations will also play a part. I've got an 8-color press which helps. The program will knock a job back to fewer colors, but there again, it's doing so with a fixed palette and that has got to have an effect. When Dan does a job your hardware situation will play a part in his calculations from the get-go. This isn't to trash Steve's skill at creating QuikSeps Pro, or the developers of other similar programs, but their set of actions and the palette they choose are calculated as something of a "one-size-fits-all" because it has to. Dan's are calculated on the particular job at hand. It's comparing apples to oranges, truthfully. It's a bit like comparing "auto-trace" to redrawing by hand a file that needs to be vector.
I've also tried doing simulated and index seps from scratch, and in spite of the YouTube videos and magazine articles, I've never gotten anything I could use.
As for my remarks regarding Dan's processes, they're based entirely on posts he and his customers have made on these forums. Ask Pierre for the details. My remarks on QuikSeps are likewise based on my experience, and bear in mind that I'm one prone to "fixing" things, sometimes whether they need them or not.
Okay, I'm now turning off my "Bill Hood Makes A Short Story Long" mode, likely leaving you more confused than you were when I started. As Maxwell Smart would say, "Sorry about that, Chief."

tonypep:
Short answer is.......depends on what your expectations are.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page